pedroclobo wrote: > This looks fine to me. I think it would also make it a bit easier to extend > to address #99268 and friends.
Thanks. I would look into it after merging this stack. > Were you also considering adding support in ConstantFolding? Might make sense > to address this contextually before employing the new instructions (given, > also, that we still don't emit byte-typed IR), as GVN wouldn't otherwise > perform simple store to load forwards here > (https://llvm.godbolt.org/z/zn6o7Mcca). > I'm not sure on the ordering of this change vs others introducing the new > instructions on byte type however. I've implemented the constant folding changes for the new instructions. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/226583 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
