https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33065
Stephen Hines <srhi...@google.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #10 from Stephen Hines <srhi...@google.com> ---
Moving this back to Resolved/Invalid. Unfortunately, the C and C++ Standards
Committees don't always see eye-to-eye on every potential related issue. This
is one such example. I have no evidence that Clang is leveraging the ordering
of these arguments to do something different in C vs. C++ today, but that
doesn't prevent them from doing something like that in the future. The right
thing is to fix your code based on the warning, since the warning does complain
exactly about what the C standard requires here.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
