https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36876
Bug ID: 36876
Summary: IRET instruction has a different naming convention to
RET/LRET
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Backend: X86
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Found during fixing models for D44687:
RET/LRET use the naming pattern:
RET(L|Q|W)
LRET(L|Q|W)
But IRET uses the naming pattern:
IRET(16|32|64)
Do we want to standardize this?
The IRET mnemonic is IRETW/IRETD/IRETQ so it seems a better match, and would
have helped the AMD guys who wrote the Znver1 entries assuming it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
