https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47286
Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Hans Wennborg <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Max Moroz from comment #2)
> Yes, it expects a small number after the "lim: ", as that number indicates
> the temporary input length limit enforced by the -len_control= feature.
>
> I suspect the feature is WAI, but the number printed is >=100 as the first
> line in the output is coming from a mutation #10629, i.e. earlier mutations
> used the smaller lim value.
>
> To fix this, I would kindly ask you to change
>
> RUN: not %run %t-CustomMutatorTest -len_control=100 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
> --check-prefix=LLVMFuzzerCustomMutatorWithLenControl
>
>
> to
>
> RUN: not %run %t-CustomMutatorTest -len_control=1000 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
> --check-prefix=LLVMFuzzerCustomMutatorWithLenControl
>
> len_control goes from 100 to 1000, that would make it more aggressive and
> should keep the "lim: " value small even after 10,000 mutations
Done as 8421503300c6145480710761983f089ccbe0bb56 on trunk and
46f3aed198a5530b5115881628e1fcfb3e7541c9 on 11.x.
Optimistically marking this fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
