https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48663
Bug ID: 48663
Summary: "strange" brace wrapping of block regarding
afterfunction/aftercontrolstatement options
Product: clang
Version: 10.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Formatter
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Created attachment 24351
--> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=24351&action=edit
actual config files used (both config are in the file)
I found an inconstant behavior/interaction between the two options of
BraceWrapping
AfterFunction
AfterControlStatement
Maybe I misunderstand something, but the behavior differ from clang-format-9 I
use to have. Complete config as attachment.
Maybe related to/duplicated of 47936
(https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47936)
The strange output is when
BraceWrapping:
AfterControlStatement: Always
AfterFunction: false
```
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{ c++; }
if (i)
{ d++; }
```
I would expect the same output as (which is what I obtain with clang-format-9,
with the config above), but I do not want to have break after functions.
BraceWrapping:
AfterControlStatement: Always
AfterFunction: true
```
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
{
c++;
}
if (i)
{
d++;
}
```
note that these looks fine, but are not my intent.
BraceWrapping:
AfterControlStatement: Never
AfterFunction: false/true
```
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++){
c++;
}
if (i) {
d++;
}
```
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
