https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51759
Arthur O'Dwyer <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Arthur O'Dwyer <[email protected]> ---
> I believe that long double in this case has 80 value bits and 48 padding bits
Ah, I see. Well, I'll just have to find some other way to inspect those bits
(inside std::strong_order), then. (And/or make std::strong_order non-constexpr
for long doubles. The Standard doesn't seem to specify whether it needs to be
compile-time-evaluable for any particular type, which I think is a known LWG
issue in general...)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
