| Issue |
163683
|
| Summary |
Spurious warning in C++11 when attempting to define a constexpr destructor
|
| Labels |
clang:diagnostics
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
shafik
|
In C++11 we are not allowed to declare/define a `constexpr` destructor, we obtain the proper diagnostic for this in clang but if we attempt to also define is then clang provides a completely spurious diagnostic as well: https://godbolt.org/z/Geq7Th7oh
```cpp
struct A {
constexpr ~A(){}
};
```
Diagnostic:
```console
<source>:2:3: error: destructor cannot be declared constexpr
2 | constexpr ~A(){}
| ^
<source>:2:13: error: constexpr function's return type 'void' is not a literal type
2 | constexpr ~A(){}
| ^
```
The second diagnostic is just not helpful at all.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
