| Issue |
174256
|
| Summary |
-Wmissing-designated-field-initializers complains even when the field has a default CTOR
|
| Labels |
new issue
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
kcc
|
```
cat ~/tmp/missing-designated-field-initializer-test.cpp
struct Foo {
Foo(){} // CTOR
};
struct Bar {
int a{};
Foo foo;
};
Bar getBar() {
return {.a = 42};
}
```
```
~/LLVM-21.1.0-Linux-X64/bin/clang -c -Wmissing-designated-field-initializers ~/tmp/missing-designated-field-initializer-test.cpp
.../tmp/missing-designated-field-initializer-test.cpp:11:18: warning: missing field 'foo' initializer [-Wmissing-designated-field-initializers]
11 | return {.a = 42};
| ^
1 warning generated.
```
This warning would be extremely useful if `foo` didn't have a constructor, but in this case this warning is just a noise.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
