| Issue |
182566
|
| Summary |
[clang-format] Support ignoring implicit access modifiers
|
| Labels |
clang-format
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
nabelekt
|
Please support ignoring implicit access modifiers. I want to get
```cpp
#pragma once
class ClassA
{
public:
struct type_a_t
{
type1_t a;
type2_t b;
type3_t c;
type4_t d;
// Conversion operator to MCC-generated config struct
explicit operator type_b_t() const
{
return type_b_t{ static_cast<uint8_t>(a),
static_cast<uint16_t>(b),
static_cast<uint32_t>(c),
static_cast<float>(d) };
};
};
};
```
to look like
```
#pragma once
class ClassA
{
public:
struct type_a_t
{
type1_t a;
type2_t b;
type3_t c;
type4_t d;
// Conversion operator to MCC-generated config struct
explicit operator type_b_t() const
{
return type_b_t
{
static_cast<uint8_t>(a),
static_cast<uint16_t>(b),
static_cast<uint32_t>(c),
static_cast<float>(d)
};
}
};
};
```
there are a couple/few separate problems here, but the first is that within the braces for `struct type_a_t`, everything is indented twice because we have `IndentAccessModifiers: true` and there is an implicit access modifier at the start of the struct definition.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
