Hmm .. didn't think of that, but it passed all the tests. All the tools still have top level exception handlers so its not like we'd generate an unexpected_exception error. Some memory cleanup could be missed, but the process is going to exit anyway. Temporary files that need to be cleaned up are generally done in the tool's code, so that should be okay. What else could go wrong?
Reid. On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 09:35 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:30 AM, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > For PR797: http://llvm.org/PR797 : > > 1. Actually turn on -fno-exceptions in libraries that do not have the > > REQUIRES_EH option in their Makefile. The following library file > > size > > savings were made (DEBUG): > > Very cool, but... is this safe? If libsystem throws an exception, > then everything between it and the tool that finally catches the > exception have to be compiled with EH support on... > > -Chris
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
