Well, I'm using the most recent version of both llvm and llvm-gcc (revision 254). 21 of the failures are ARM, but I don't care about those. llvm-test is still running, but it's on track to matching the 275 failures I got the last time I ran it.
I'm not going to switch to Linux or OS X or even 32-bit FreeBSD, and I'm not going to spend the time figuring out why LLVM hates 64-bit FreeBSD--especially as it's getting worse, not better--and it's clear no one else is going to spend the time either. So I'm putting LLVM back on hold until later this year and hopefully the situation will be better then. Reid Spencer wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 12:01 -0800, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> In the two weeks since I last ran them, the regression tests have gone >> from 4 to 63 unexpected failures. Is this expected? >> > > No, TOT gives me 6 right now .. 5 in the new ARM backend (be patient) > and 1 in the X86 backend. > > >> _______________________________________________ >> llvm-commits mailing list >> llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
