On Feb 22, 2007, at 2:25 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: >> + the GPL). This is not a problem for the main LLVM >> distribution (which is already licensed under a more liberal >> license), but may >> be a problem if you intend to base commercial development on >> llvm-gcc without >> redistributing your source code.</p> > > Maybe you should make explicit that there is no problem using llvm- > gcc to compile > proprietary code - there is only a problem if parts of llvm-gcc are > included in > the proprietary program. You do say that more or less a few lines > before, but this > last sentence could great doubt in peoples minds. Maybe you could > offload the > problem onto gcc, and say that compiling a program with llvm-gcc is > like compiling > it with gcc, and give a link to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl- > faq.html which > discusses these issues.
Done, thanks! -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits