On 10/26/07, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Bill, I must say that I don't like this patch at all. Is there > > > no better way? > > > > I'm open to suggestions. :-) What part do you object to? > > All of it! But let's not go there :) > > > I've only seen this problem on PPC64. In particular, it's writing this > > information into the "redzone" because this is a leaf function, and > > thus the destination may be unaligned. > > Can you please send me the gcc tree dumps, and also what debug_tree > gives for the modify_expr. > I'm no longer able to reproduce it with TOT minus my patch. I reverted the patches to llvm-convert.cpp in 4.0 and 4.2. I'm going to add a test to make sure that this continues to work.
-bw _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
