http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2885
Bill Wendling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Bill Wendling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-17 13:49:50 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Bill, reverting r56628 fixes the assertion, but I get Dwarf Errors out of GDB.
>
> I understand that patch was probably making a bad situation problem better,
> but
> is there anything you can do about this assertion? I'd be happy to trade the
> compile failure for bad debug info.
>
I looked at it and it seems as if there's a problem with comparing mangled
names with their unmangled counter parts. I've been mucking through the debug
code and it appears that linking the subprogram description with the
appropriate machine function isn't feasible. At least not with the current
debugging infrastructure we have.
I can disable the assertion, which will get you past this point.
"Fixed"
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=57714&view=rev
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
