http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8101
Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> 2011-10-09 16:22:06 CDT --- The only place where Clang currently differs from the requested semantics is for int[]. Since this is a POD type, the GCC definition of __has_nothrow_constructor(int[]) is documented to evaluate true, per http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Type-Traits.html -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
