http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19024
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from [email protected] --- Clang's headers are not consistent in the names they use for their include guards; most of them seem to omit an additional CLANG. I think it would be better if your project changed their include guard naming convention to be standards-compliant. As you suggested I'm closing this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
