http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20554
David Blaikie <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from David Blaikie <[email protected]> --- Generally Clang warnings aren't implemented for stylistic constraints like this. (the litmus test is usually "if this can't be enabled by default then it's probably not appropriate as a compiler warning") But such a feature could possibly go into a tool like clang-tidy. http://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy.html (not sure if we have a Bugzilla feature for that at the moment) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
