toby im still new to the programming world and audio world in this regard as
well so please forgive my ignorance.
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Tobias Doerffel
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Dienstag, 6. April 2010 19:15:11 schrieb Jonathan Aquilina:
> > instead of type casting and mixing 32bit and 64bit why not go with a
> 64bit
> > float, wouldnt you this way be able to also in a way allow for backwards
> > compatibility with 32bit processors or am i mistaken. also im noticing
> with
> > a testing version of lmms for windows in 64bit that toby linked in google
> > buzz a while back for testing im noticing a big performance difference
> > between it and 32bit. load times are quicker loading for example the demo
> > tracks load alot quicker then on 32bit same with all the plugins they use
> > etc.
> Please do not mix up support for 64 bit CPUs and internal processing data
> format. Noone disagrees with software (LMMS) usually running faster on 64
> bit
> CPUs if compiled for them :-)
>
> Toby
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> LMMS-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
