On 03/30/2014 08:26 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > An SDK usually only makes sense for proprietary platforms (where the > whole source code is not available) or large and complex systems. > However for LMMS all you have to do is to clone the repository, copy a > simple instrument, add it to plugins/CMakeLists.txt and change > everything according to your needs. > > Setting up an SDK which the same build infrastructure and header files > just would be duplicate work with little benefits. >
A reference implementation might make sense though? A simple instrument which doesn't do much - produces a sinewave, maybe? - which would be extensively commented, and would get shipped with LMMS but not built by default... If this sounds like a good idea, I could write it, seeing as I have some recent experience with instruments :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
