I am really into democracy right now, so the way I think it should be done
with the demo songs is a combination of voting and judges. Judges pick out
some songs (to make sure the songs are good and shows a variety of LMMS'
functions) and then the community vote on those they think should be
included. 

With presets I am not sure we want democracy (can't believe I just wrote
that), cause what everyone likes is probably some few specific sounds, and
presets should be vastly different.


Tres Finocchiaro wrote
>>  just adding or replacing about 10 songs.  What are your points of view?
> 
> In my opinion, it would be certainly nice for someone to take charge of
> this in addition to managing the presets, including adding new ones from
> LSP as they are deemed good enough.  This lends to the quality of the
> overall application and hopefully people can set feelings aside if a
> particular preset or project is retired (AFAIK, retiring or renaming a
> particular presets won't break project compatibility at all).
> 
> I know Avelocity has stepped up to the judging panel for the songs
> competition, which I have grown very fond of (I have a hard time believe
> some of those tracks were made with LMMS!) but the talent for judging can
> continue to be put to good use with the development of the project too.
> 
> -Tres





--
View this message in context: 
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/A-suggestion-for-the-demo-tune-tp7565p7643.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to