Thanks for the clarification guess my perspective on LMMS is a bit different to yours in terms of whats there feature wise.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote: > On 04/04/2014 11:09 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > What I am trying to say is why make it a bit more complex then what is > > actually needed. I would start with something basic where we can click > > on samples and they loop and then add features as needed > > What's the point? LMMS currently doesn't work with samples in a way that > it would be flexible enough for your idea to be useful with just > samples. Say you write a pattern for an instrument, then get it looping > in that live-mode. Now you have to export the entire song, and if that > loop is only part of your song, go edit the resulting wave in an > external editor, save it, then open it up again in LMMS... all just to > get a loop to play. > > How would that be useful? > > LMMS currently excels in two categories: 1) it's native instruments 2) > the ease of composing tracks with them. We don't have native sample > recording and even our sample-track functionality is only half-functional. > > If you just want a sample-looper, you basically already have that - the > bb-editor. You can put samples in the bb-editor, add a bar-long note on > each one, adjust the tempo and/or bar length, then press play on the > bb-editor. Then you can just switch each sample on/off with the mute > buttons. We don't need any new functionality for what you're proposing - > it's already there... > > > > > -- Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
