I think you are right in that I should use LMMS users for wiki mails. Going to do that from now on, so people who wan to know what is happening on the wiki must subscribe to the user list.
Here are the Opulenz page: http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Opulenz I must reconsider the 1.0 instrument pages.. currently they are the same as 0.4, but some of them have gotten new images. Links to the next and previous instrument will also be strange for the 0.4 instruments because 1.0 have two new. I don't know if it is important to keep the structure of the 0.4 pages or just not overwrite them? Like they can be searched for but they can't be clicked and found. Raine M. Ekman wrote > Here's the text for a page I tried to contribute earlier: > http://sourceforge.net/p/lmms/mailman/message/31889203/ > > (I see now that I sent it to the -user list, maybe not an optimal > strategy...) > > Feel free to improve it... > > -- > raine@ > softrabbit on #lmms -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Wiki-revival-tp8762p8816.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
