On 07/27/2014 07:58 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > "We already also call instrument track TCO's patterns so it's established > usage for us." - @diizy. No, we are clearly diverged in this matter. You > said you wanted a name for all TCO's, an umbrella term. I say OK, but we can > decide that later.
No, we can't decide that later, and we can't change one part of the nomenclature separately without ensuring it all works out into a consistent naming scheme. > > To take one thing first; renaming the Beat + Bassline. Now I list up the two > most popular options. > 1. Keep it > * Pros: Familiar, traditional safety, gives information about what exactly > you can use the B+B tracks for > * Cons: Long, includes a plus sign, B+B isn't self explaining, LMMS > exclusive > 2. Rename to Pattern Editor (or Pattern Sequencer) > * Pros: Implies loops (but not only beats), used in other programs, more > logical and easy > * Cons: New name, patterns might be used in another part of the program (if > we decide so) Stian, those are not the only two options (or "most popular"? according to whom?) and we haven't even discussed most of the options here yet.. Please stop trying to rush this issue. > > Do you want to do a new one of this? There was an old one? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
