Tobias Doerffel-2 wrote
> Hi,
> 
> I'd vote for keeping lmms-devel and drop lmms-users. Migrating to a
> completely new ML is very hard to do and obviously mailinglists primarily
> are being used for development purposes. IMHO our users prefer using the
> forum and other social media. Maybe for release announcements we could
> create a new ML "lmms-announce".
> 
> Toby

I think LMMS announcements would be great. That implies that it isn't so
often active and you won't necessarily get answers on that list. Instead all
questions should be asked at LMMS devel.


Jonathan Aquilina wrote
> Would it be wise to let the users know they are going to be added to this
> list before the merge happens?

Yes, but that is a cruel thing to do. I think one should just inform that
one would have to register for devel or forums instead.



--
View this message in context: 
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Proposal-to-merge-these-two-lists-tp4078p11157.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to