Well, we were as close as we're ever going to get on "Sequence Editor", so
we could milestone that, right? Toby liked Paul's recommendations here
<https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/120#issuecomment-33194952>.
You're right, this is a sensitive subject that's hard to agree on, but I
feel that 2.0 may be the right time to make a decision on it. Perhaps it's
not as important as I am making it though. :\
- [email protected]
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/31/2014 08:54 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> > @Vesa,
> >
> > Should we consider either of these as part of 2.0?
>
> Eh, I don't know. Name changes are hard, we never reached any kind of
> consensus on any of the name change issues... personally, I'd be fine
> with renaming Song Editor -> Sequencer, but calling BB-editor "Pattern
> Editor" just seems stupid to me. And some people want the "Pattern
> Editor" name, but dislike the "Sequencer" idea.
>
> Maybe if we can figure out some combination of names that is acceptable
> to mostly everyone, then we could move forwards with this.
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
