Vesa has talked about increasing the size of the instrument windows for
2.0 and I think this is a good idea, see:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Going-forward-LMMS-2-0-tp10709p10728.html

Now, I speak having in mind what a developer working exclusively on an
instrument and not on general LMMS means. I agree with what you mean
about our current instruments, we may even overhaul and make them more
significant, but even with the way they are today people are making a lot of
great stuff: check lmms.io forum and LSP.

Instead of creating even more instruments, having someone working on
improving LMMS with sound processing knowledge would help much more, I
know that I don't have this knowledge yet and we have a *lot* of work to
do to improve it.

See LV2 support for example: if we support it we'll have a world of
instruments at our disposal, a simple search for "lv2 drum sampler"
yields results of very high quality instruments:

- http://drumkv1.sourceforge.net/drumkv1-index.html
- http://openavproductions.com/fabla/
- http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/all/drmr_lv2_drums (extended hydrogen)

I am not saying your argument is invalid, but that people already have
invested a lot of work on LV2, LADSPA, DSSI and VSTs. Users will be
able to have high-quality instruments regardless of if they're internal
or not, given that we enable support.

But a high performance, reliable, crash-free core is much better.

Unfortunately, my DSP knowledge is not that great, so I focus on UI and
fixing crashes for now. But hopefully I'll be able to overcome these
limitations.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to