I'd think that would be reasonable. The idea behind implementation limits like this is to accommodate a range of underlying hardware capabilities. As ODP applications get developed and deployed I suspect we'll have a better understanding about what applications actually need with regard to things like this.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Job Abraham <job.abra...@avagotech.com> wrote: > Hi > > As I understand, each ODP implementation can define > ODP_PACKET_MAX_HEADROOM. > Is 64 a sufficient number to handle most use cases of ODP applications? > > Regards, > Job > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > >
_______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
