On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Ciprian Barbu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Ciprian Barbu <ciprian.ba...@linaro.org> > --- > test/validation/odp_schedule.c | 63 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/test/validation/odp_schedule.c b/test/validation/odp_schedule.c > index 31be742..bdbcf77 100644 > --- a/test/validation/odp_schedule.c > +++ b/test/validation/odp_schedule.c > @@ -11,9 +11,11 @@ > #define MSG_POOL_SIZE (4*1024*1024) > #define QUEUES_PER_PRIO 16 > #define BUF_SIZE 64 > -#define TEST_NUM_BUFS 100 > +#define NUM_BUFS 100 > #define BURST_BUF_SIZE 4 > -#define TEST_NUM_BUFS_EXCL 10000 > +#define NUM_BUFS_EXCL 10000 > +#define NUM_BUFS_PAUSE 1000 > +#define NUM_BUFS_BEFORE_PAUSE 10 > > #define GLOBALS_SHM_NAME "test_globals" > #define MSG_POOL_NAME "msg_pool" > @@ -229,7 +231,7 @@ static void schedule_common(odp_schedule_sync_t sync, int > num_queues, > args.sync = sync; > args.num_queues = num_queues; > args.num_prio = num_prio; > - args.num_bufs = TEST_NUM_BUFS; > + args.num_bufs = NUM_BUFS; > args.num_cores = 1; > args.enable_schd_multi = enable_schd_multi; > args.enable_excl_atomic = 0; /* Not needed with a single core */ > @@ -261,9 +263,9 @@ static void parallel_execute(odp_schedule_sync_t sync, > int num_queues, > thr_args->num_queues = num_queues; > thr_args->num_prio = num_prio; > if (enable_excl_atomic) > - thr_args->num_bufs = TEST_NUM_BUFS_EXCL; > + thr_args->num_bufs = NUM_BUFS_EXCL; > else > - thr_args->num_bufs = TEST_NUM_BUFS; > + thr_args->num_bufs = NUM_BUFS; > thr_args->num_cores = globals->core_count; > thr_args->enable_schd_multi = enable_schd_multi; > thr_args->enable_excl_atomic = enable_excl_atomic; > @@ -459,6 +461,56 @@ static void test_schedule_multi_1q_mt_a_excl(void) > ENABLE_EXCL_ATOMIC); > } > > +static void test_schedule_pause_resume(void) > +{ > + odp_queue_t queue; > + odp_buffer_t buf; > + odp_queue_t from; > + int i; > + int local_bufs = 0; > + > + queue = odp_queue_lookup("sched_0_0_n"); > + CU_ASSERT(queue != ODP_QUEUE_INVALID); > + > + pool = odp_buffer_pool_lookup(MSG_POOL_NAME); > + CU_ASSERT_FATAL(pool != ODP_BUFFER_POOL_INVALID); > + > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_BUFS_PAUSE; i++) { > + buf = odp_buffer_alloc(pool); > + CU_ASSERT(buf != ODP_BUFFER_INVALID); > + odp_queue_enq(queue, buf); > + } > + > + for (i = 0; i < NUM_BUFS_BEFORE_PAUSE; i++) { > + buf = odp_schedule(&from, ODP_SCHED_NO_WAIT); > + CU_ASSERT(from == queue); > + odp_buffer_free(buf); > + } > + > + odp_schedule_pause(); > + > + while (1) { > + buf = odp_schedule(&from, ODP_SCHED_NO_WAIT); > + if (buf == ODP_BUFFER_INVALID) > + break; > + > + CU_ASSERT(from == queue); > + odp_buffer_free(buf); > + local_bufs++; > + } > + > + CU_ASSERT(local_bufs < NUM_BUFS_PAUSE - NUM_BUFS_BEFORE_PAUSE);
Whats is the expected behavior here, Shouldn't it be CU_ASSERT(local_bufs == 0) ? meaning, the complete pause ? > + > + odp_schedule_resume(); > + > + for (i = local_bufs + NUM_BUFS_BEFORE_PAUSE; i < NUM_BUFS_PAUSE; i++) { > + buf = odp_schedule(&from, ODP_SCHED_WAIT); > + CU_ASSERT(from == queue); > + odp_buffer_free(buf); > + } > +} > + > static int create_queues(void) > { > int i, j, prios; > @@ -594,6 +646,7 @@ struct CU_TestInfo test_odp_schedule[] = { > {"schedule_multi_mq_mt_prio_a", test_schedule_multi_mq_mt_prio_a}, > {"schedule_multi_mq_mt_prio_o", test_schedule_multi_mq_mt_prio_o}, > {"schedule_multi_1q_mt_a_excl", test_schedule_multi_1q_mt_a_excl}, > + {"schedule_pause_resume", test_schedule_pause_resume}, > CU_TEST_INFO_NULL, > }; > > -- > 1.8.3.2 > > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp