On 01/22/2015 12:06 PM, Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:lng-odp-
boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of ext Ciprian Barbu
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:36 PM
To: Ola Liljedahl
Cc: lng-odp
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: add odp_schedule_pause and
odp_schedule_resume tests

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org>
wrote:
On 7 January 2015 at 20:41, Mike Holmes <mike.hol...@linaro.org> wrote:
I am unsure if I need to pay attention to this for 0.7.0
We need to have a decision (and implementation) for ODP 1.0 though.
Scheduling and its semantics are important aspects of ODP.
The odp_schedule_pause API is already documented and implemented, I
didn't exactly catch from Petri if we will keep the behavior for 1.0,
but what is the problem with covering this API in its current form for
at least 0.7 and 0.8?

There are no plans to change schedule pause/resume API.

-Petri
So we are adding this patch, right?

Maxim.


_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp


_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to