On 23 April 2015 at 13:54, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 23 April 2015 at 19:34, Mike Holmes <mike.hol...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 23 April 2015 at 13:13, Ola Liljedahl <ola.liljed...@linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 23 April 2015 at 12:14, Taras Kondratiuk <taras.kondrat...@linaro.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/22/2015 09:21 PM, Mike Holmes wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We have mentioned EOs in only one place and not defined them any where
>>>>> in the API doc
>>>>>
>>>>> /**
>>>>>   * Set queue context
>>>>>   *
>>>>>   * Its the responsability of the interface user to make sure
>>>>>   * queue context allocation is done in an area reachable for
>>>>>   * all EOs accessing the context
>>>>>
>>>> Even if we avoid using the term EO (Execution Object) as Taras suggests
>>> (and I agree), the description above is not very clear (understatement).
>>> What is probably meant is that it is the responsibility of the user to
>>> ensure that the queue context is accessible by all threads that attempt to
>>> access it. As an example, if using the ODP (multi)process model, queue
>>> contexts should be allocated from ODP shared memory (including pools using
>>> shared memory) and not from some per-process allocator (e.g. malloc).
>>>
>>>
>> Ola you have made the mistake of appearing knowledgeable ;)
>>
> Don't confuse appearance with substance.
>
>
>> I may quote you in a patch to fix this documentation.
>> However in your description you also use the term thread and process
>> which are in my mind equally bad terms to EO but in this case they mean
>> something to Linux rather than Open Event Machine.
>>
> I don't agree. Pretty much no-one will know about EO's but most
> programmers know about threads and their understanding will be pretty close
> to what we mean. A thread means a thread of execution. It may or may not
> have its own process (which provides address space, resource ownership etc).
>
>
>>
>> I am being pedantic to try to get clarity but should the terminology be:-
>>
>> It is the responsibility of the user to ensure that the queue context is
>> accessible by all odp_tasks that attempt to access it.
>> As an example, if using the multi odp_task model, queue contexts should
>> be allocated from ODP shared memory (including pools using shared memory)
>> and not from some per odp_task allocator (e.g. malloc).
>>
> I think odp_task is a poor choice. A task is doing something specific
> work, each task has a specific purpose. ODP is much closer to a worker
> thread model where threads are interchangeable (like worker bees).
>
> I think we should stay with "thread". I actually don't understand why you
> are having a problem with it.
>

Only clarity, unless the topic is provoked we all assume we are in
agreement on terminology.


>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>   *
>>>>>   * @param queue    Queue handle
>>>>>   * @param context  Address to the queue context
>>>>>   *
>>>>>   * @retval 0 on success
>>>>>   * @retval <0 on failure
>>>>>   */
>>>>> int odp_queue_set_context(odp_queue_t queue, void *context);
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we add a Glossary and define odp_workers and execution objects
>>>>> etc?
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we fix this instance to just say "all threads accessing the
>>>>> content" becasue we already use the term "thread" extensively in the
>>>>> API
>>>>> docs ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thread feels very Linux specific and we dont really mean a thread since
>>>>> it could be a process even for Linux.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Execution Object has different meaning in Open Event Machine framework.
>>>> We should avoid using Execution Object name for ODP workers.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lng-odp mailing list
>>>> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>>>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mike Holmes
>> Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
>> Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Mike Holmes
Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to