This is, of course very strange to me, as the usage of the "old" functions will keep spreading, and we'll be stopping halv way done. I guess Brian can apply his review-by, as patch 11-35 are the same as v6
But if the alternative is nothing done... Christophe. On 18 May 2016 at 17:02, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 05/18/16 14:14, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote: > >> Reviewed patches 1-10 >> >> Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen <petri.savolai...@nokia.com> >> > Petri, Christophe, are you ok with merging 1-10 first, and next after that? > > Maxim. > >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of >>> Christophe Milard >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 4:04 PM >>> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org; brian.bro...@linaro.org; >>> mike.hol...@linaro.org >>> Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCHv7 00/35] running things in process mode >>> >>> Pull can be performed from the URL at the end of this cover letter >>> All patches sent to the list following Maxim's request. >>> >>> Since v6 >>> -rebased >>> -regrouping history, squashing patch 1 and 12; 4, 5 and 12 (Petri) >>> -mixed mode test removed (but still claimed to be supported in ODP). >>> (Petri) >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> lng-odp mailing list >> lng-odp@lists.linaro.org >> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp >> > > _______________________________________________ > lng-odp mailing list > lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp > _______________________________________________ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
