On 8 August 2016 at 03:01, Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 08/05/16 21:27, Anders Roxell wrote:
>
>> On 2016-08-03 11:40, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   configure.ac | 4 ++--
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
>>> index c0eb207..bd16370 100644
>>> --- a/configure.ac
>>> +++ b/configure.ac
>>> @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])
>>>   ############################################################
>>> ##############
>>>   # Set correct platform library version
>>>   ############################################################
>>> ##############
>>> -ODP_LIBSO_VERSION=110:0:1
>>> +ODP_LIBSO_VERSION=111:0:0
>>>   AC_SUBST(ODP_LIBSO_VERSION)
>>>   -ODPHELPER_LIBSO_VERSION=110:0:1
>>> +ODPHELPER_LIBSO_VERSION=111:0:0
>>>   AC_SUBST(ODPHELPER_LIBSO_VERSION)
>>>
>> The SO-version doesn't need to change. The SO-version only needs to be
>> changed when an interface has been added, removed, or modified since
>> the last update [1].
>>
>> For this release the API version should be changed and we should change
>> the version in include/odp/api/spec/version.h.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Anders
>> [1] https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/Updati
>> ng-version-info.html
>>
>
> Yes, but it's looks like very strange for me if .so version 110:0:0 and
> odp version is 1.11.0.0.

I think that also can be confusing for other people and not clear how to
> patch .so version
> to tag in git repo.


It should not be confusing for people, linux is very specific about the
 rules for a .so version.
We are trying to be very specific in our API release numbering doc.
On OS "wherever" you can be completely sure the API number will not match
that OS'es mechanisms for version libraries.



> Maxim.
>



-- 
Mike Holmes
Technical Manager - Linaro Networking Group
Linaro.org <http://www.linaro.org/> *│ *Open source software for ARM SoCs
"Work should be fun and collaborative, the rest follows"

Reply via email to