I was preparing for compression patch2 and updated it today again to use odp_feature_t to indicate sync/async in capability (as per last but one check-in).
So what is the proposal meanwhile? Should we instead use odp_bool_t to indicate feature (like async/sync mode) support until it is finalized? Thanks Shally -----Original Message----- From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of GitHub Sent: 19 April 2017 13:32 To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: [lng-odp] [Linaro/odp] 6ce267: Revert "api: ipsec: factor out definitions for fea... Branch: refs/heads/api-next Home: https://github.com/Linaro/odp Commit: 6ce267197a66180042916368a469ed9dcc33eaa7 https://github.com/Linaro/odp/commit/6ce267197a66180042916368a469ed9dcc33eaa7 Author: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org> Date: 2017-04-19 (Wed, 19 Apr 2017) Changed paths: R include/odp/api/spec/feature.h M include/odp/api/spec/ipsec.h M include/odp_api.h M platform/Makefile.inc M platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am R platform/linux-generic/include/odp/api/feature.h Log Message: ----------- Revert "api: ipsec: factor out definitions for feature support levels" This reverts commit d025907602c5 ("api: ipsec: factor out definitions for feature support levels") Petri rejected this patch and plan write some common solution Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uva...@linaro.org>
