bogdanPricope replied on github web page:

example/generator/odp_generator.c
line 200
@@ -784,10 +811,33 @@ static void print_pkts(int thr, thread_args_t *thr_args,
        unsigned i;
        size_t offset;
        char msg[1024];
+       interface_t *itfs, *itf;
+
+       itfs = thr_args->rx.ifs;
 
        for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) {
                pkt = pkt_tbl[i];
 
+               itf = &itfs[odp_pktio_index(odp_packet_input(pkt))];
+
+               if (odp_packet_has_ipv4(pkt)) {
+                       if (itf->config.pktin.bit.ipv4_chksum) {
+                               if (odp_packet_has_l3_error(pkt))
+                                       printf("HW detected L3 error\n");
+                       }
+               }
+
+               if (odp_packet_has_udp(pkt)) {
+                       if (itf->config.pktin.bit.udp_chksum) {
+                               if (odp_packet_has_l4_error(pkt))
+                                       printf("HW detected L4 error\n");
+                       }
+               }
+
+               /* Drop packets with errors */
+               if (odp_unlikely(odp_packet_has_error(pkt)))


Comment:
No -  we need to print csum errors first.
This part was significantly changed in api-next (csum checks use different/ new 
API) and it makes no sense to optimize it for the old (master) code. After 
integration in api-next, this part will be  reworked  to use less parser flags 
(reduce parsing level).
For example, removing L4 parsing and locating interface is bringing an extra 1 
mpps.

> bogdanPricope wrote
> '-r' may work.


>> Bill Fischofer(Bill-Fischofer-Linaro) wrote:
>> Having an option to use direct mode seems reasonable, but shouldn't we 
>> retain schedule mode (perhaps as a command line switch)? This would provide 
>> an easy means of testing scheduler efficiency as it is tuned. At least in 
>> some environments we'd like schedule mode to show better performance than 
>> direct.


>>> muvarov wrote
>>> that has to be the first check.


>>>> muvarov wrote
>>>> -r ?


https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/343#discussion_r157139066
updated_at 2017-12-15 12:26:54

Reply via email to