------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
In low income neighborhoods, 84% do not own computers.
At Network for Good, help bridge the Digital Divide!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/EpW3eD/3MnJAA/cosFAA/e0EolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

The News International - March 29, 2005

THE INVISIBLE BORDER
by Khurram Baig

It is a serious humanitarian problem: Indian and Pakistani fishermen 
straying into the territorial waters of each other's country are 
often arrested and imprisoned. Each fisherman arrested represents an 
entire family deprived of its main breadwinner, not to mention the 
fact that they are held without the basic legal and human rights that 
every citizen, even of another country, is entitled to.

A limited exchange of fishermen has been made possible in recent 
years, thanks to improving relations between the two countries and 
consistent lobbying by human rights organisations. Under the 
bilateral Pakistan-India Cultural agreement reached in 1988, each 
side releases prisoners on an on-and-off basis, but more are arrested 
just as frequently.

It is difficult to determine the exact number of those still 
imprisoned in the two countries, since the governments do not release 
the figures. The magnitude of the problem is indicated from the 
numbers available with the Pakistan Fisherfolk Forum, which claims 
that 153 Pakistani fishermen and 802 Indian fishermen are in the 
jails of the two countries. On January 2, 2005, Pakistan released 268 
Indian fishermen, while another 529 were released on March 20, 2005. 
India has just released 93 Pakistani fishermen, due to arrive in 
Pakistan on Monday.

The agencies' task has been made difficult by the "exchange protocol" 
-- the procedure followed for the release of the fishermen, which is 
similar to the one applicable in the case of prisoners of war. At 
every stage from the time of their arrest, the fishermen are kept in 
the dark. They are not released even after the completion of their 
terms of punishment: they have to wait for a formal exchange of 
prisoners to take place.

Trades unions and labour support groups of both India and Pakistan, 
and their common platform, the South Asian Labour Forum (SALF), have 
been drawing the attention of the authorities of two countries to the 
plight of the fishermen. It has demanded the unconditional release of 
all the detained persons, and a stop to the mid-sea arrests and the 
imprisonments, and has also often criticised the absence of a clear 
policy of action to prevent the arrest and detention of fishermen.

Another SALF demand is that India and Pakistan mark out their 
maritime boundary by buoys and other marking devices. It also 
emphasises the need for an agreement among countries of the South 
Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) that would enable 
fishermen of the maritime member-nations to fish in the Arabian Sea, 
the Indian Ocean and the Bay of Bengal without hindrance. India, 
Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and the Maldives share the resources 
of the Bay of Bengal, the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea. India has 
a long coastline, 7,417 km. Pakistan's coastline meets India's 
1,640-km-long Gujarat coast. However, there are no bilateral 
agreements on maritime boundaries between India and any of the South 
Asian countries.

The provisions of the Maritime Zones of India Acts of 1976 and 1981, 
under which the fishermen are detained and punished, do not 
correspond with those of the United Nations Convention of the Law of 
the Sea, of which India is a signatory. The Maritime Zone of Pakistan 
Act is almost identical to the Indian law. The SALF has demanded that 
these Acts be amended to bring them in consonance with the UN 
Conventions. It has also requested that fishermen's organisations and 
trade unions be represented at, and consulted on, bilateral or 
regional negotiations on this issue.

For fishermen, the concept of marine borders is difficult to 
comprehend. The ocean has been their workplace and their families 
have been engaged in fishing for generations. So they feel they are 
victimised for political reasons.

Apart from the fact that there are no signals on the sea demarcating 
the maritime boundary between India and Pakistan, there is not even 
an agreed boundary. For their mutual convenience, the two countries' 
patrolling agencies have worked out an imaginary line in the Sir 
Creek region, off the Kutch coast. Fishing boats, especially those 
with engine failures, can easily, and do, stray into neighbouring 
territory owing to tidal currents, wind force or cyclones. The 
captured Pakistani and Indian boats have no navigational aids.

There is also the issue of retaliatory action. For example if the 
Pakistan side captures Indian boats and fishermen, chances are that 
Indian maritime forces will do the same at the earliest opportunity. 
For many years now, fishermen's unions, boat owners' associations and 
trade unions in the two countries have asked their respective 
governments to work out a long-term solution. Since 1988, the Shree 
Akhil Gujarat Machhimar Mahamandal, the Fishermen's Boat Association, 
the Diu Porbandar Machhimar Boat Association, the Gujarat Marine 
Products Exporters Association, the National Fishworkers Forum and 
others have made several representations to the Indian government.

Similar efforts have been made on this side of the border. The 
Fishermen's Cooperative Society and the Fishermen's Union, the 
Pakistan Institute of Labour Education and Research and the Pakistan 
chapter of SALF have taken up the issue with the government.

The authorities of the two countries invariably cite national 
interests. In the process, they appear to have lost sight of two 
major questions: the fishermen's right to livelihood and the 
incompatibility of the countries' laws with regard to the seas and 
internal laws and conventions.


_________________________________

Labour Notes South Asia (LNSA):
An informal archive and mailing list for trade
unionists and labour activists based in or
working on South asia.

LNSA Mailing List:
Labour Notes South Asia
To subscribe send a blank message to:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

LNSA Web site:
groups.yahoo.com/group/lnsa/

Run by The South Asia Citizens Web
www.sacw.net
_________________________________



To join the Labour Notes South Asia Mailing List, send a blank message to:   
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lnsa/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Reply via email to