On 14.01.2014 15:47, Pedro Lamarão wrote: > There are no 2003 extensions. > ISO C++ 2003 is the same as ISO C++ 1998 with the incorporation of > various errata. > > Perhaps you are worried about Visual C++ 6. @Pedro Ok, it's true that I was mainly thinking to the tr1 dialect... sorry for the approximation.
Btw, I'm effectively worried for the compatibility with some microsoft chains (but not VC6), which, unfortunately, doesn't fulfill any of the standards, but instead provides a partial mix of them. But not only - putting more attempt to the compilation chain can simplify our life, but also restrict the availability/portability of the lib. On 14.01.2014 17:32, chand priyankara wrote: > What you really mean by '~restrict'? > Is it for some recent releases, or just like forever? > > And whats the actual root cause to get in to this kind of a problem? @Chand By "not ~restrict", I mean no active actions to ensure the strict conformance, but avoiding explicit breakage, like the codefix proposed with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-390. -- flo
