[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13899249#comment-13899249
]
Thorsten Schöning edited comment on LOGCXX-394 at 2/12/14 4:34 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
> loggertestcase : -log4cxx: No appender could be found for logger (x).
> log4cxx: Please initialize the log4cxx system properly.
> -Line 396: Level::getError() == a0->getEffectiveLevel() was
> expected to be true, was false.
> FAILED 1 of 10
> Failed Tests Total Fail Failed %
> ===================================================
> loggertestcase 10 1 10.00%
> which I'd not noticed before.
was (Author: tschoening):
That said, I do now see
loggertestcase : -log4cxx: No appender could be found for logger (x).
log4cxx: Please initialize the log4cxx system properly.
-Line 396: Level::getError() == a0->getEffectiveLevel() was
expected to be true, was false.
FAILED 1 of 10
Failed Tests Total Fail Failed %
===================================================
loggertestcase 10 1 10.00%
which I'd not noticed before.
> Levels are not thread safe
> --------------------------
>
> Key: LOGCXX-394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-394
> Project: Log4cxx
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Appender
> Environment: Windows 7, Visual Studio 2010 SP1
> Reporter: Petro Protsyk
> Assignee: Thorsten Schöning
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: thread-safety
>
> Level.cpp. All default level variables are function static. This is not
> thread safe, especially in Visual C++ compiler.
> Here is code to reproduce the issue in VC++ 2010:
> Concurrency::parallel_for (int(0), int(10), [&](int i)
> {
> if (::log4cxx::Level::getWarn() == NULL)
> {
> throw std::exception();
> }
> });
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
