Hi all, Any further suggestions in going forward other than Incubator or Attic? or else, can we get in to a conclusion, please.
regards, *Chand Priyankara* [image: Facebook]<http://www.facebook.com/chand.priyankara> [image: LinkedIn] <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/chandpriyankara> [image: Blogger] <http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com/> [image: Google Plus]<http://plus.google.com/104246340732624023499> |BSc(Eng) - Electrical & Information |(094) 773-361-566 |ch...@engineering.com |http://chandpriyankara.blogspot.com <http://www.iucnredlist.org/amazing-species>sent via internet On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 12:13 AM, Florian Seydoux <florianseyd...@gmail.com>wrote: > Le Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:04:25 +0200, > Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote : > > > [...] > > Basically there are many people who "keep > > an eye on the project", discuss, commit a few things but keep their > > level of activity pretty low. This works too, as long as the person > > "sticks" with the project. > <snip> > > Hi All, > > As a user of this great library since almost 7 years (with some > discontinuities) , I'll be very happy to see it "back online". > > The proposition of Christian to move them on Incubation stage makes > sense, and seems even very appealing. > > Despite I didn't actively contributed till now, I would be very happy > to offer some of my time for such task, following the quoted opinion > here above. > > Of course, starting by simply providing patches would already be a > first step for me - I just wanted to let you know that there are > potential workpower, just waiting some activity on the lib to be > 'activated'. > > Cheers > > Florian > >
