Thanks for the quick response Ceki.
I also have another problem. When using the category.fatal(message,
exception) method, the stack trace that is produced from the exception does
not seem to use the platform specific new line character. Therefore the
stack trace is difficult (well annoying anyway!) to interpret.
<Disclaimer>I haven't fully investigated this yet. I have currently only
tried this on Windows and only with the SMTPAppender.</Disclaimer>
By the way. Thanks for a brilliant product. We're are starting to use it for
more than just logging, we are producing alerts by Email for users.
Thanks.
Dave.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>From: Ceki G�lc� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Java 1.1 & Log4J 1.1....Does it work?
>Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:14:43 +0200
>
>
>This is a well known and documented problem that comes up regularly.
>
>Here is what the log4j FAQ says:
>
>What are the prerequisites for log4j?
>
>- Log4j is JDK 1.1.x compatible.
>
>- Nevertheless, RollingFileAppender requires JDK 1.2 or above. This will be
>fixed in future releases of log4j. If you need RollingFileAppender to run
>under JDK 1.1 then you can simply remove RollingFileAppenderBeanInfo.class
>from log4j.jar.
>
>HTH, Ceki
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
