Wolfgang,
Yes, a day or so ago. It's a preliminary commit, in the sense that the code still
needs to be completed and tested. Ceki
At 16:14 13.08.2001 +0200, you wrote:
>Has there been any commit related to (optionally) using BufferedOutputStream in
>File|Socket|SyslogAppender?
>(and I don't mean AsyncAppender)
>
>Wolfgang.
>
>>Cool. Of course buffering means log4j should be shut down properly when
>>exiting the JVM so as to flush the buffer. Here it would be highly
>>useful to be able to depend on the 1.2 shutdown hook.
>>
>>Anders
>>
>>
>>Ceki G�lc� wrote:
>>>
>>> Anders,
>>>
>>> Do you remember the discussion we had about buffering in FileAppender?
>>> We now have a real world example showing that you were right and I was wrong.
>>> See http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2341
>>>
>>> My performance tests were done on my machine with a single user logged on, doing \
>>> just the tests. In real world situation you have a many processes accessing the \
>>> disk. And in that situation buffering is all the more important.
>>> Fortunately, this one is not hard to fix. Cheers, Ceki
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Ceki G�lc� - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
