Why not create a new logger class, and keep the the
old category (deprecated and changed to call Logger's
functions) for backward compatibility
--- Ceki G�lc� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> Hello all,
>
> I just wanted to inform you that it is plain
> impossible to retain backward compatibility with
> existing log4j (user) code and get away with
> renaming Category as Logger. I just threw away hours
> of work to retain backward compatibility.
>
> Category will remain as the backbone class in log4j
> even if Logger is perhaps a better name. Regards,
> Ceki
>
>
> --
> Ceki G�lc� - http://qos.ch
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
