I have attached the new version using Vector instead of ArrayList -- turned out to be easier than I expected.
Personally, I think people should get up to JDK1.3 or so... Kevin Ceki G�lc� wrote: > Well, it's rather important because otherwise log4j does not compile > not run under JDK 1.1.x. Since the JDBCAppender is now (or will be) part of the > official distribution it kind of important that the whole shebang compiles > under JDK 1.1.x. > Wouldn't you think? > > At 15:22 25.03.2002 -0800, you wrote: > >I suppose that's possible, according to Sun however, ArrayList is preferred > >(and faster). > >How important is it? > > > >Kevin > > > >Ceki G�lc� wrote: > > > > > Kevin, > > > > > > Is it possible to use Vector instead of ArrayList in order to > > > keep JDK 1.1 compatibility? > > > > > > -- > > > Ceki > > > > > > My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/ > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >-- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- > Ceki > > My link of the month: http://java.sun.com/aboutJava/standardization/ > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
JDBCAppender.java
Description: application/unknown-content-type-jbuilder.javasource
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
