----- Original Message ----- From: "Niclas Hedhman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Log4J Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 6:14 AM Subject: Re: Binary compatibility between versions of log4j
> Ceki, I can undertstand that you are "irritated" over this issue, but I can > also understand everyone's concern, as we are dealing with a VERY fundamental > service here. > I would like to suggest that one of the following approaches are taken; > [...] > 2. A factory for obtaining the Logger, which is an interface only, a method to > initialize the subsystem that doesn't reference the configurator classes > directly. And if I stick to these, I am guaranteed a binary functionality for > decades. [...] Yes, the classic and painless way. Some days ago, I was arguing about that approach in "Differences in XMLConfiguration beetween ver. 1.1 and 1.2" mail. Best Regards, Giuseppe. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
