Ack. Maybe Mike can add this feature as part of a modification to support locales as part of the parameter. His design for identifying the timezone vs locale etc is better and different than the original tainted submission. What do you say, Mike? Want to write your version of this feature?
Oh well, I know better now. :-) sorry, -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Ceki G�lc� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 1:12 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: [SUBMIT] Timezone support for date elements of pattern > layout > > > At 22:55 15.06.2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >This code was submitted to me directly by someone that > wished to remain > >anonymous and didn't want to handle the submission process > themselves. I > >told them I would shepard this change through review and checkin, if > >accepted. This was some time ago, and I just got a chance > to review the > >changes and apply them to the current version of the code. > > I am sorry but we cannot accept anonymous contributions. The anonymous > benefactor must decline his/her identity and must be the legal > copyright holder. Otherwise, I have to ask all log4j developers to > stop studying the code submitted by the anonymous contributor. > Moreover, we cannot use that code to patch existing log4j source. > > The copyright applies to the source code and not to the idea of having > a timezone parameter delimited by a special character. As long as we > don't use or refer to the "suspicious" source code, we can freely > discuss the issue of a second timezone parameter. > > > -- > Ceki -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
