DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11142>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11142 org.apache.log4j.net.SocketServer doesn't work with DOMConfigurator Summary: org.apache.log4j.net.SocketServer doesn't work with DOMConfigurator Product: Log4j Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Minor Priority: Other Component: Other AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] As the docs say, PropertyConfigurator isn't nearly as flexible as DOMConfigurator. Is there a reason _not_ to allow this? I've been using a simple (i.e. not bulletproof) fix (in 3 places): if (configFile.endsWith(".xml")) DOMConfigurator.configure(configFile); else PropertyConfigurator.configure(configFile); Let me know _how_ you want this fixed for real (if it's not restricted for a reason) and I'd be happy to do it. Regards - --Steve -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
