Hi Alexander, I had myself already taken a look at log4jME to notice the same thing. Personaly, I wouldn't use any deprecated class in my new projects so I decided to use log4j and then siwtch to log4jME when an up-to-date version is available (they are said to be compatible).
Lately anyway, I have considered the possibility of using log4j for a game engine project. I would rather use log4jME but there is still no up-to-date version. Also there is a method that I miss in both versions of log4j: Logger.isWarnEnabled() (and possibly isErrorEnabled) to stay fast. So I was about to try and make my own nano-very-very-limited-tiny-log4j and then came the christmas holydays... :( Maybe a project similar to log4jMe should come up directly within the recently proposed log4j-sandbox project. It could get things easier to synchronize... Regards, Herv� On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Alexander Erk wrote: > Hi logj4 people, > > I am planing to use the log4jME in one of my projects. First I've looked > for a small version of log4j and the workplan for log4j 1.2 showed me, > that there is log4jME available. > When I look into the code, I see that log4jME is still using the > Category class. But logj4 itself moved over to the use of the Logger > classes. Is it still "save" to use the Category classes, or will it be > advisable to wait for a ner version of the log4jME stuff , then using > the Logger class? > > Thanks > > -- > Alexander Erk, Dipl.-Inf. (FH) > Institut fuer Rundfunktechnik GmbH > Diensteentwicklung und Medieninfrastruktur > Floriansmuehlstr. 60 > 80939 Muenchen, Germany > > Tel: +49 (0)89 32399- 282 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Fax: +49 (0)89 32399- 200 web: www.irt.de > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
