My Chainsaw wish list:

- ability to sort messages by various columns (sort by time with most recent
at bottom instead of top, sort by level, logger, etc)
- ability to filter by MDC key/values, filter by multiple category/level
names, maybe just let me define my own filter chain?
- ability to configure/add new remote sources via gui (support input via new
v1.3 Receivers).

I think I have mentioned these before...:-)

-Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oliver Burn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2003 4:11 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: RE: Where can I help?
> 
> 
> Hi Raymond,
> 
> I am the original author of Chainsaw. I have lots of ideas on
> how to improve Chainsaw, but due to time constraints I have
> basically taken on the role of maintainer. I will fix any
> reported bugs, and endeavour to incorporate patches. I also
> have dialogue with some people who would like to modify
> Chainsaw. So I would be happy to coordinate with you to improve
> Chainsaw.
> 
> WRT Chainsaw not being compatible with output from earlier
> XMLLayout format. This is intentional, in so far that when
> the format changed, I updated Chainsaw to work with the new
> format. From memory I am not sure if it was possible to
> be backwardly compatible - that could have been due to
> using a validating XML parser. If it is easy and reliable
> to support both formats, then this is a good fix.
> 
> Please feel free to e-mail directly.
> 
> Regards,
> Oliver
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Raymond DeCampo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, 10 February 2003 11:07
> > To: Log4J Developers List
> > Subject: Re: Where can I help?
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestions.  I think I'll give some effort towards
> > improving Chainsaw.
> >
> > Toward that end, when I was trying to get Chainsaw going today, I
> > noticed that it is not compatible with output from earlier XMLLayout
> > output that use "category" instead of "logger".  Was this 
> intentional or
> > should I submit my fix?
> >
> > Is anybody else actively working on Chainsaw?  If so we should
> > coordinate our efforts.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ray
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > All of Scott's suggestions are good.  Ray, what are your
> > interests in the
> > > log4j code?  What area would you like to look 
> at/contribute to?  We can
> > > certainly suggest an area to look at, but if you have a
> > specific area of
> > > interest, then it will be more interesting, certainly.  Your
> > interest and
> > > effort are most welcome.
> > >
> > > For anyone out there interested in contributing code, I
> > started a wiki page
> > > with some  guidelines/requirements:
> > >
> > >
> > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages/Co
> > ntributingC
> > > ode
> > >
> > > I'd be very interested in documenting the steps one must go
> > through to get
> > > the current log4j cvs code compiling on one's machine.  Would
> > someone be
> > > interested in documenting the process in that page as well?
> > >
> > > -Mark
> > >
> > >
> > >>-----Original Message-----
> > >>From: Scott Schram [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >>Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 6:02 PM
> > >>To: Log4J Developers List
> > >>Subject: Re: Where can I help?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Until the log4j gurus have a chance to respond, may I suggest:
> > >>
> > >>Take a look at the Wiki and see if information there is complete,
> > >>or could
> > >>use improving.
> > >>
> > >>http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages
> > >>
> > >>And the "todo" pages there for ideas:
> > >>
> > 
>>http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?Log4JProjectPages/ToDo
> >>
> >>Make sure you can get the source code via CVS, and compile it.
> >>
> >>Here are some possible areas to work on:
> >>
> >>http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/plan.html
> >>
> >>A couple catch my eye: add automated tests.  Improve Chainsaw.
> >>
> >>Scott
> >>
> >>At 12:25 PM 2/8/2003, you wrote:
> >>
> >>>All,
> >>>
> >>>I haven't been involved with open source before but I've
> wanted to for a
> >>>while.  I figured I would take the plunge with log4j.
> >>>
> >>>Where can I be of help?  Should I just grab some bugs from
> Bugzilla and
> >>>go?  Does anyone have any in particular they'd like to see tackled but
> >>>don't have the time themselves?
> >>>
> >>>Thanks,
> >>>Ray
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to