I guess my question is, are you thinking of adding/using some jdk 1.4 specific code, Luis? If yes, then that code should probably "optionally" compilable, similar to how the jms, etc code is in today's build script.
As a side note, if I were to add some jdk 1.4 specific code to log4j, it would be a java.nio implementation of the socket related classes. It would be nice if SocketAppender/SocketHubAppender/SocketNode could change their behavior based on what jdk is detected at runtime, but that would require jdk 1.4 to compile. -Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Ceki G�lc� [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 4:12 PM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: Log4J compiling requirements > > > > Luis, > > Compilation tricks are a headache to maintain. Unless there > is a compelling > reason, the code should compile with JDK 1.2 not only 1.4. > > At 21:27 15.02.2003 +0000, you wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I know that the running requirement for Log4J 1.2 is JDK > 1.1, although > >some parts of it only compile on JDK 1.2 (eg, LF5). > > > >Is it acceptable that minimum JDK for compilation is 1.4 although the > >code can still run on 1.1 or 1.2 ? > > > >Thanks, > >Luis > > -- > Ceki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
