As the LoggingEvent properties and the MDC properties are just a mapped set
of properties attached to a different context, how about representing them
using the same consistent form in XML. How about throwing in some other
thread specific properties? What about something like:

<properties context='thread'>
        <item name='NDC'>[item value]</item>
        <item name='ThreadName'>[item value]</item>
        <item name='UserName'>[item value]</item>

        <item name='[MDC property name]'>[item value]</item>
        <item name='[MDC property name]'>[item value]</item>
</properties>
                
<properties context='event'>
        <item name='[Event property name]'>[item value]</item>
        <item name='[Event property name]'>[item value]</item>
</properties>

Just some thoughts...

------------
Nicko Cadell


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 19 March 2003 11:14
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
> Subject: Adding more MDC support to several classes
> 
> 
> Just following up on something Mark has mentioned offline re: 
> adding some more support for MDC through XMLLayout, and 
> Chainsaw.  I wanted to run some things by the group. Sorry if 
> this is a bit long.
> 
> The first thing that needs to happen is to modify the 
> log4j.dtd file to incorporate the MDC structure info. I'm no 
> XML expert, but here's my first guess at an example format :
> 
> <log4j:MDC>
>  <MDC key="MyKey1" value="MyValue2"/>
>  <MDC key="MyKey2" value="MyValue2"/>
>   .......
> </log4j:MDC>
> 
> If anyone has any comments, speak up now! :)
> 
> After we're set on the format, it'll be (as Mark said) a snap 
> to modify XMLLayout to include MDC, and then I think just a 
> fraction more effort to modify Chainsaw's XMLFileHandler to 
> digest(!) the MDC info back from XML into something Chainsaw handles.
> 
> Lastly, the PatternParser class needs to provide a format for 
> outputing ALL the MDC key/value pairs if no extra %X option 
> is added.  Now, since the MDC is basically a Hashtable, would 
> anyone object to the format of the output via the 
> PatternParser being just the Hashtable.toString()?. cheers,
> 
> Paul Smith
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to