> Sorry my previous message went off too quickly. > > Hi Mark, Paul, Scott, > > This commit was probably not necessary at all. What is the difference > between this XMLLayout and the one in log4j proper? Can we remove this > duplicate file?
In XMLLayout's case,I'm having a hard time finding the difference. Maybe I can just delete the sandbox one. Scott? Can you clarify here? > Having duplicates lying around makes it quite difficult to maintain > the code. Now that both Scott and you have access to the log4j CVS > repository and not just the sandbox, I ask you please stop maintaining > duplicates in log4j and log4j-sandbox. Given that your enhancements to > chainsaw remain unchallenged, please also migrate chainsaw as well as > the new plugin, receiver code. > > Is that OK with everyone? Mark? I'm certainly ok with that, probably the major classes in the Sandbox that you and Mark should review before this happens though are: * SocketReceiver * SocketNode * SocketNodeEventListener * log4j.dtd Since these are changes to classes that are already in 1.2.7 or earlier. There are some new Appenders/Receivers in the sandbox, but since they will not have been used by many, if at all, they are probably safe to merge into the core. While we're here, could the Servlet and Selector stuff go into core now too? They look/sound very useful. Paul --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
